Friday, December 28, 2007

Article about the Dutch couple mentioned in previous post

Dutch govt backs diplomat in Korea adoption row
Web posted at: 12/14/2007 4:1:22
Source ::: REUTERS

HONG KONG • A Dutch diplomat who returned an adopted Korean girl after seven years has won his government's backing, a newspaper said yesterday of a case that sparked outrage among social workers in Hong Kong.

A South Korean consular official in Hong Kong said the couple, who adopted the 8-year-old child when she was four months old, had handed her over last year into the care of Hong Kong authorities.

The South China Morning Post said the diplomat, Raymond Poeteray, and his wife, Meta, had "received the support of the Dutch consulate-general and the country's department of foreign affairs". The couple adopted the girl while they were based in South Korea, believing they could not have children. The wife later gave birth to two children, the report said.

"The diplomat gave no explanation for his decision except to say 'the adoption had gone wrong'," the paper reported. "I don't have anything to say to the public. It is something we have to live with," Poeteray was quoted as saying. The Post quoted a source at the Dutch consulate in Hong Kong as saying nothing illegal had happened.

"It is a private matter, but as a good employer we will assist in this matter in the interests of the child," the source was quoted as saying. Hong Kong's Korean community voiced outrage at the child's treatment and were working with the consulate and Hong Kong's social welfare department to try to find her a new home.

"It is an unfair situation, many Koreans want her to find a new family," said a representative for the Korean Residents Association in Hong Kong. Hong Kong's Social Welfare Department said foster parents were now caring for the girl, but declined further comment. "She is Korean and her situation after seven years of adoption is that she is hurting," the South Korean consular official said.

News and Such

Interesting adoption commentary article from Kenya, I believe.

When an adoption gets dissolved

Story by KEN KAMOCHE
Publication Date: 12/23/2007

Adoptions tend to make headlines when celebrities like Angelina Jolie and Madonna decide that an exotic child from the wilds of Asia and Africa would make a nice adornment to the family.

Thousands and maybe millions more take place every year, and hopefully work out for all concerned.

But once in a while an adoption comes unstuck and all manner of stories fly around, raising serious questions about whether the best judgment has been exercised by do-gooders who presumably wanted to give an abandoned child a new start in life and enrich their own lives too.

The case of the Dutch couple which hit the headlines and was analysed in angry and indignant tones in chat rooms around the world illustrates how things can go so badly wrong.

One Raymond Poeteray and his wife Meta gave up to Hong Kong Social Services a Korean child they adopted seven years ago when she was only four months old.

They claim the girl had serious ‘‘bonding problems,’’ couldn’t adjust to Dutch food and basically didn’t fit into their culture.

There are a few troubling issues about this account. How do you decide that a child you’ve raised since she was an infant suddenly doesn’t adjust to your food and culture? Presumably she was subsisting on non cultural-specific milk and baby cereals at the beginning and then, like most other children, graduated to more solid stuff.

To suggest that for the seven years they’ve raised her she has never ‘‘adjusted’’ to their food defies logic.

This is where the stories by the baby sitters begin to shed some light, if they’re true. One woman said that the girl was raised by Asian domestic helpers, one during the day and the other in the evening, which is not unusual in itself.

More worrying is the claim that ‘‘Meta did not treat her as her real daughter’.’’ According to the child-minder, the child was rarely in her mother’s arms; ‘‘there was no love there’’. That is quite an indictment in itself.

It also shows how apparent failure by the parents to get her accustomed to their cuisine and assimilated to their lifestyle might explain why she might have developed an appetite for Asian delicacies presumably prepared by the helpers.

It has also been reported that the girl was adopted in the first instance because the couple believed they couldn’t have children. They went on to have two children of their own later, a factor that has sparked off the accusations of wilful neglect and what have you.

Commonsense suggests that though a phobia of bonding is not unusual amongst adopted children, it shouldn’t manifest itself beyond early childhood.

Something must have gone terribly wrong, and maybe the whole story will never be told.

Outraged Dutch people writing to newspapers talk about being ashamed and disgusted that their own, who happen to be diplomats, can abandon a child like an unwanted toy, or in the words of one Dutch newspaper, like ‘‘unwanted household rubbish’’. Others call it a crime against natural justice.

Strong words, strong emotions and serious concerns about the ethics of dissolving adoptions. A blogger described it as ‘‘band aid solution to infertility problems’’.

It is not the first time a case like this has been reported widely. A few years ago, an Irish couple returned an adopted child to an orphanage in Indonesia claiming the child didn’t ‘‘fit in’’.

These sorts of things give a bad name to what is an otherwise noble undertaking. Maybe one positive outcome of this whole Dutch saga is that authorities will be more vigilant about how the process is managed and how the suitability of potential parents is vetted.

These things tend to be rushed, especially where money or big names are involved.

And sometimes there’s more than a little doubt about whether the right procedures have been followed, or whether the right people have given their consent, as in Madonna’s adoption of a Malawian boy, which remains mired in controversy.

Authorities in Asia are in the spotlight, and will remain so, because in some countries foster parents from the West are still seen as the most viable for the millions of unwanted female children waiting for a new life in orphanages and unable to find a home amongst their own countrymen.

In societies where boys are prized over girls, adoption by foreigners is often the only hope. Most are probably well-meaning.

But some seem to be wholly unprepared for the challenges of a culturally or ethnically-blended family. And, sadly, a minority fail to go that extra mile, and forget that a child does not come with a love-by date.

When monks and the militia in Cambodia clash as they did again this week, the scenes are ludicrous in the extreme.

You have on the one hand, men who are supposed to be the peace-loving, pious guardians of the nation’s moral consciousness.

On the other hand you have a different breed of guardians altogether, gun-totting, hardened men who are taught to protect the regime ostensibly to maintain law and order.

When the two come to blows and kung-fu kicks, it is a sad reflection of the extent to which a country can degenerate, accusations of who started it notwithstanding.



IF you wish to contact the writer of this article, you can at:

interneteditors@nation.co.ke

Prize for . . .

Tuesday, December 18, 2007

Meez?

I've posted before about the yahoo "virtual me" and how I could stand on the Great Wall of China in my karate "git-up"

But AOL has taken the cake on this one. I don't know if it is my morbid sense of humor, self-loathing (not really), or even racist fascination - AOL has created the ultimate "Meez."

In this one, you can have "almond shaped" eyes.

You can wear a karate "gi".

You can animate to "eat rice" out of a bowl with chopsticks.

You can set it to be in Chinatown.

Take a look for yourself. www.meez.com

Happy creating of your virtual self.